Order Custom Essay Cheap and Save Your Time | TeslExpress Writing Service

Assistance in writing paper reviews

hire a paper writer

Review – this is a personal impression of a particular reader about the work read. There are no requirements for either style, structure, or design. A good tip is an interesting, perhaps useful text. The reader is not a professional in the literary sphere, so when writing a review, he only shares his thoughts, emotions, reflections that arose when reading a book. Review performed by a professional in order to provide a broad mass of readers with recommendations and assess the artistic value of the book. Classical literary review, written in a journalistic style, in fact is a scientific work. However, today it is more often possible to find reviews of another plan – consumer (the same review) and custom (paid advertising).

How to write a review about the book: plan Read or re-read the book. Do not be surprised at this advice, some manage to write a review of the book after watching a movie shot on it, or after such a time that only some details of the plot are recalled. Start with yourself. It is necessary to remember that it was the reason to read this particular book, to recall the events of one’s own life, which could affect the emotions during reading. Imagine a person or an audience, which you will refer to when reading. It can be close, friends, some abstract reader with similar literary tastes or someone else of your choice. Such visualization is very helpful in finding the right words. It is impossible to understand how to write a review about a book without sketching out an approximate structure of the future text. This will help to understand the sequence of thoughts.

Strictly speaking, the reviews are written in an arbitrary form. But if you let your thoughts flow freely, you often get a hard-to-read confusion. That is why it is important, before writing a review about the book, to work out the future structure of the text.

one should not forget about such a concept as a school literary response, to which a little more demands are made: there must be a summary of what has been read, and reasoning in the form of a composition, and a concise conclusion.

Book review structure

How to write a review about your favorite book, all roughly represent: when it comes to the best that they read in life, then words and emotions overflow. But if the work did not leave such a noticeable trace in the soul or did not like at all, then the reader sometimes finds it difficult to formulate his thoughts in the form of a bound text.

How to write a good review about the book? If you liked the work, then nothing is easier. Thoughts and emotions overwhelm, I want to admit love and the book, its characters, and the author who created this miracle. And here, strangely enough, natural shyness can prevent: the reader is ashamed to admit to such strong feelings, is afraid to appear stupid or too dull-eyed in the eyes of those who do not appreciate this work so highly. Tip: Before writing a review about the book, drop aside any restraint and focus only on what you really liked. Each reader has their own like-minded people, and they will be pleased to read a positive article. And the author will be especially pleased, it will help him to understand that he is doing everything right and he has his own audience.

Before you write a review about a book you read in a negative way, you need to analyze what exactly caused such strong negative emotions. Perhaps this particular book is not meant for you? After all, many authors write for a certain audience, focus on some kind of gender or age. It is clear that a man who reads out by highly targeted gangster detectives, weakly appreciates a female love story with elements of investigation, and an adult woman will not understand the teenage books that she took to read because of obsessive advertising.

Another point that often leads to criticism from the reader is deceived expectations. It often happens that the title and annotation promises one thing, but in fact the book is something else, not necessarily bad. However, in almost every work you can find your weaknesses and strengths. Therefore, before writing a review about the book, think carefully: do not write insults, humiliate the author or other readers. Instead of insulting the writer, try to tell as politely and correctly as possible, in which, in your opinion, he is wrong (usually this applies to some specific topics and details), point out the illogical actions of the characters, the weak points of the plot.

Mistakes in writing a review

Before you write a review, plan it. And plan with the knowledge that the short review should not contain more than 300 words. People should spend no more than 5 minutes to read it! After all, this is a short review.

In the review – as in the composition in school – everything should be in order! First, the entry, then the main part (usually this listing of the merits of the goods \ site, the cons do not usually write, because the client is always right, and advertisers do not like when their services are looking for errors).

The introduction is literally a couple of suggestions, in the style of: “Every day hundreds of products come out, but only a small amount of them deserve attention.” We will consider one of these products today. ” In general, fantasy is our everything. The main part is a simple list of pluses and not more. The conclusion is the most important, by the way! People pay attention to the end, or rather, to say the right way, do not pay attention, but remember it. So even if you start a horrible, the middle is more or less, and the ending is just super-duper, 95% of readers will appreciate the review! For basically only the beautiful end will be remembered. As in the books: it can be boring at the beginning, in the middle we will want to abandon it, but if the ending is interesting, then we may even decide to re-read this book, so we will like it! So, over the conclusion Sit down, think. He should like it. It will also have pros, but not new ones, but those that you listed. For example, in the main part, you say that this product is sold all over the world. In the conclusion, you can write something like: “… Since this product is sold all over the world, we can be sure of its quality.”

Once your review is ready, reread it again. In particular, pay attention to the conclusion, if you do not like the review itself – it’s okay, but if you do not like the output – be sure to redo it.

Principles in writing a book review

Proposals should be simple and concise. Avoid pompous adverbial turns and superfluous epithets. Keep an eye on the thought, carefully formulate the reasoning. 9 Avoid value judgments. Accent disputed points, questionable details, plot twists. Leave the reader to draw their own conclusions. 10 Describe your feelings, what feelings the book caused, what made you think. How much you liked the work, is it worth it to buy for a home library.

The review is a review, review and evaluation of a new scientific, artistic or popular science work. As a rule, the review is devoted to one work and is characterized by a small volume and a brevity.

Do not make a detailed retelling. This will reduce the value of your review. First, the work itself will be uninteresting to the reader. And secondly, one of the criteria for weak analysis and evaluation is rightly considered substitution of interpretation and analysis of the text by retelling it.

Any book begins with a title that is interpreted during the reading, solved. The name of a good interesting work is always multivalued, it is a kind of a symbol, a metaphor.

Much to interpret and understand the text can give an analysis of the composition. Reflect on what compositional techniques (ring structure, antithesis and others) were used in the work. This will help you penetrate the author’s intent. Determine which parts can be divided into text, how they are arranged.

It is necessary to evaluate the style, originality of the writer. Disassemble the images, artistic techniques that the author uses in his work. Also consider, in what its individual, unique style is defined and consists. Than this writer differs from others.

When writing a school review, make it up as if no one in the examining committee has been familiar with the work for which the review was made. It is necessary to assume what questions the teachers can ask, and try to find answers in the text in advance.

An approximate plan for a review of a work of art: Give a bibliographic description of the work (specify the author, title, publisher and year of release) and a brief (no more than two sentences) retelling of the content; Write a direct response to the literary work (recall-impression); Carry out a comprehensive analysis or critical analysis of the text. Here it is necessary to determine the meaning of the name, the analysis of its form and content, the skill of the author in depicting the characters, the features of the composition, the individual style of the writer; Give a reasoned assessment of the work and write your personal thoughts. This paragraph should contain the main idea of the review and the relevance of the subject matter of the work.

Main points of abstract

The requirements for writing abstracts are so different that somehow you ask yourself:

Is this really one kind of job? Some abstracts are similar to the report, others – to a small coursework. And this is not accidental, because the family of abstracts is quite extensive. The main classification of abstracts distinguishes the following types:

1) A report on a special topic;

2) Explanation and analyzing books and

The classification of abstracts according to the source of the material supply is fairly well known, dividing them into two types: productive and reproductive.

Reproductive (these abstracts, abstracts, and abstracts-resumes) are aimed at a laconic reproduction of the content of the source with the identification of the main thoughts and positions

Productive (abstracts-reports, abstracts-reviews) consist of critical analysis, creative comprehension of the collected material. In the review-review author should collect information on the theme from several sources and compare them, analyzing the views of different authors

There are several other classifications of abstracts.

According to the completeness of the presentation, there are informative and indicative ones. Informative is much larger in volume. They laconically, but fully reflects the information presented in the source, the author’s argument of the source. These are abstracts-abstracts.

Another classification – by the number of primary sources. There are monographic essays built on the study of a single source, there are overviews – to write them you need to study the views of several authors. Let us also consider the classification according to the purpose of the abstract. They are divided into general and specialized. General are addressed to a wide audience, specialized – to a highly specialized group of listeners

Classifications of abstracts overlap.

For example, the summary abstract is both reproductive and indicative at the same time. And the abstract-abstract is reproductive and informative.

Why is it necessary to know? Well, first of all, it’s a good idea to imagine the first of the work that you are writing. Secondly, the student, who writes abstracts to order, it is necessary to clarify the client, what type of work is required? Agree, there is a difference – to write a monograph abstract-abstract or an overview report-report. And the student who orders the essay from the student, it is necessary to specify the type of the abstract

It’s not so important to know all features of each kind. Just to know the difference in common.

Scroll To Top