Proposals should be simple and concise. Avoid pompous adverbial turns and superfluous epithets. Keep an eye on the thought, carefully formulate the reasoning. 9 Avoid value judgments. Accent disputed points, questionable details, plot twists. Leave the reader to draw their own conclusions. 10 Describe your feelings, what feelings the book caused, what made you think. How much you liked the work, is it worth it to buy for a home library.
The review is a review, review and evaluation of a new scientific, artistic or popular science work. As a rule, the review is devoted to one work and is characterized by a small volume and a brevity.
Do not make a detailed retelling. This will reduce the value of your review. First, the work itself will be uninteresting to the reader. And secondly, one of the criteria for weak analysis and evaluation is rightly considered substitution of interpretation and analysis of the text by retelling it.
Any book begins with a title that is interpreted during the reading, solved. The name of a good interesting work is always multivalued, it is a kind of a symbol, a metaphor.
Much to interpret and understand the text can give an analysis of the composition. Reflect on what compositional techniques (ring structure, antithesis and others) were used in the work. This will help you penetrate the author’s intent. Determine which parts can be divided into text, how they are arranged.
It is necessary to evaluate the style, originality of the writer. Disassemble the images, artistic techniques that the author uses in his work. Also consider, in what its individual, unique style is defined and consists. Than this writer differs from others.
When writing a school review, make it up as if no one in the examining committee has been familiar with the work for which the review was made. It is necessary to assume what questions the teachers can ask, and try to find answers in the text in advance.
An approximate plan for a review of a work of art: Give a bibliographic description of the work (specify the author, title, publisher and year of release) and a brief (no more than two sentences) retelling of the content; Write a direct response to the literary work (recall-impression); Carry out a comprehensive analysis or critical analysis of the text. Here it is necessary to determine the meaning of the name, the analysis of its form and content, the skill of the author in depicting the characters, the features of the composition, the individual style of the writer; Give a reasoned assessment of the work and write your personal thoughts. This paragraph should contain the main idea of the review and the relevance of the subject matter of the work.